This is a guest post by Framingham resident and grant panel member, Cheryl Tully Stoll.
Last week when I was asked to be the first guest blogger for the newly renamed MetroWest Health Foundation I was honored. It’s an organization that I have donated great deal of time to over the last six years.
I am beginning my seventh year as a member of the
Framingham Union Grants Panel. As a grants panel member, I see my responsibility as representing the people of Framingham in the Foundation’s grants process in as ethical, knowledgeable and fiscally responsible manner as possible.
The Foundation only has a certain amount of funds to distribute to the community, and it’s the panel’s responsibility to make recommendations that will fulfill the mission of the organization while simultaneously meeting the most critical unmet health needs of a town where those needs are growing exponentially. Every dollar that we recommend spending on a particular grant application; is a dollar that we no longer have available to dedicate to another request. That makes each decision the panel makes doubly important.
Additionally, since we are a health foundation, our decisions have the potential to positively or negatively impact people’s lives. That responsibility is always part of my thought process when evaluating any grant application.
Ten Points I Consider When Evaluating a Grant Application:
1. Does the proposal attempt to address an unmet health need in Framingham?
2. Is the proposal well written and well thought out? Does the proposing agency have a clear understanding of the need they are trying to address and will their proposed actions actually address that need?
3. Does the organization have the capacity and the expertise to carry out the project they are proposing and what type of track record do they have with similar programs?
4. Is the budget appropriate to the task being proposed? What is the cost per individual benefiting; and is there a more cost effective way to achieve similar results?
5. Are the projected outcomes realistic and measurable?
6. Is there a better way to accomplish the objective than the one being proposed? Could the project be done more effectively utilizing other partners in the community?
7. Does the proposal address racial and ethnic disparities in health care in our community?
8. Is the agency proposing to use evidence-based methods to achieve their objectives?
9. Does this grant supplant government funds or pay for direct health care for individuals?
10. Is the project sustainable without the support of the Foundation at the end of the grant period?
I have found my first six years on the panel very rewarding and am looking forward to reviewing your applications in the upcoming Fall Grant Cycle. Please let me know, as a current or prospective grantee, if you find these tips helpful.